10 Comments
User's avatar
TJ's avatar

The continuation of these contracts is frightening at the amount of locations and facilities in total already accumulating.

Education is a lamp's avatar

This is frightening. Disturbing.

Melanie's avatar

I couldn’t have said it better!

Mary Ellen Griffin's avatar

Thank you for shining a spotlight on this corrupt use of taxpayer dollars, and on some of the corrupt players involved. I hope we citizens can organize ourselves to take effective action to block these expenditures.

Trink Prinz's avatar

What does this mean - "Rudiarius paid for the environmental review of a warehouse ICE bought in Roxbury, N.J."

There was a court settlement on May 12th saying that there had to be an environmental review before DHS could do any substantial work on the warehouse. Why is someone paying for this review? That is a governmental function.

Michael Wriston's avatar

There was an environmental review done on the warehouse as part of the purchase process — but not the kind of full environmental review necessary for a NEPA determination. Think of it like a home inspection prior to buying a house.

SK2, as the government’s brokerage contractor, was responsible for conducting that inspection, which was likely subcontracted to Rudiarius to order and review. Hence why Rudiarius — not SK2 — shows up on the inspection paperwork.

Susan Grodsky's avatar

Keep reporting. We need to know where we will need to be over the next few years. With signs, crossed arms, and chants.

Patricia Wilkins's avatar

NO!!! Contracts need to be thoroughly investigated!

Melanie's avatar

Excellent report!